{"id":706,"date":"2020-04-01T12:00:27","date_gmt":"2020-04-01T17:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/?p=706"},"modified":"2019-08-27T11:41:29","modified_gmt":"2019-08-27T16:41:29","slug":"tackling-revisions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/2020\/04\/01\/tackling-revisions\/","title":{"rendered":"Tackling Revisions"},"content":{"rendered":"

It\u2019s no secret that we here at GradHacker headquarters love to talk about the writing process. In the past month or so alone we\u2019ve offered tips for\u00a0getting started<\/a>\u00a0on a big writing project and\u00a0increasing productivity<\/a>and took\u00a0a deep dive<\/a>\u00a0into the writing routines of five grad students across disciplines. We\u2019ve seemingly covered it all:\u00a0the good<\/a>,\u00a0the bad<\/a>, and\u00a0the ugly<\/a>\u00a0(special shoutout to Megan for her recent and very thorough series on dissertation writing!).<\/p>\n

Our attention to the writing process is perhaps not surprising: it\u2019s a cornerstone of every graduate student\u2019s experience. But while our coverage about the writing process has been more than extensive, fewer of our \u201chacks\u201d have been devoted to the nerve-wracking and often time-consuming process of revision.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve been thinking a lot about revision lately<\/strong>. For one thing, the expository writing classes I teach require an extensive revision component that asks students to respond to feedback I provide both in\u00a0written comments<\/a>and individual\u00a0conferences<\/a>. In class, we discuss the difference between superficial editing or proofreading and in-depth revising. Revision has also been top of mind when it comes to my own work. With my dissertation now firmly signed, sealed, delivered (and\u00a0embargoed<\/a>!) and my\u00a0post-defense slump<\/a>\u00a0(somewhat less firmly) behind me, I\u2019ve found myself facing down the daunting process of starting to revise parts of my dissertation for my first book project.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m no expert on revising a dissertation into a book, though the\u00a0internet<\/a>\u00a0and other\u00a0resources<\/a>\u00a0have been illuminating about what that process entails. (Got tips? Send \u2018em my way!) And while not all revision processes are the same, I have, to date, tackled a fair number of \u201crevise and resubmits\u201d for journal articles as well as extensive revisions for my own dissertation chapters.\u00a0Along the way, I\u2019ve honed the following \u201ctried and true\u201d revision strategies \u00a0\u2015 ones that I often pass along to my students and want to share here, too!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cut The Intro<\/strong>
\nA common piece of advice, especially within the creative writing realms, is something like \u201ccut the first paragraph\u201d or cut the first line. I\u2019ve adapted this idea almost as dogma when I\u2019ve been faced with a \u201crevise and resubmit\u201d and now that I\u2019m going all\u00a0Edward Scissorhands<\/a>\u00a0on my dissertation (don\u2019t worry, it\u2019s glorious). Invariably, the introduction in my first draft is too long and rambling and either doesn\u2019t clearly articulate my claim or fails to offer any coherent sense of thesis or stakes at all (second shout-out to all the extremely patient reviewers of my article drafts! Yes, even the\u00a0Reviewer 2s<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

I\u2019m a writer who needs to do the intro first; I have a hard time writing out of order, though I know I would likely be wise to write the intro last. In doing so, I tend to favor story over argument. I admit, a bit shamefully, that I\u2019m a fan of the anecdote; I find it to be a useful way in. It\u2019s fun, it gets me excited, and, perhaps most importantly, it\u2019s a start. It doesn\u2019t, however, always make for the most useful introduction and often leads me to bury the point.\u00a0<\/strong>Indeed, the most significant and successful revisions I\u2019ve done have involved completely reworking or rewriting the intro to be more focused and to better reflect the paper\u2019s argument.<\/strong>\u00a0Of course, it\u2019s much easier to rework the second (or third or eighth) time around, once you know not only where the argument is going but where it ends up. Revising the intro is also one of the biggest pieces of advice I give my students, who often write excellent thesis statements that wind up in the conclusion or buried elsewhere in the body paragraphs. And what kind of teacher would I be if I didn\u2019t always take\u00a0my own advice<\/a>?<\/p>\n

Game Plan<\/strong>
\nWhile cutting the intro is often my first go-to revision and typically affords me a stronger sense of direction for the rest of the essay or chapter, I find the mammoth task of revising body paragraphs and arguments more unnerving. In my experience, significant argument revision is daunting at best and paralyzing at worst. I open a document and absolute dread ensues: \u201cWhere do I even start?\u201d This is especially true if I\u2019m trying to respond not just to my own sense of the project but to another reviewer\u2019s or professor\u2019s comments.<\/p>\n

Over at Chronicle Vitae, Teresa McPhil has a great\u00a0series<\/a>\u00a0on revising and resubmitting. More recently, Cathy Davidson wrote about her own tips for\u00a0addressing<\/a>\u00a0R & Rs on Inside Higher Ed. Advice abounds on\u00a0how to<\/a>respond<\/a>\u00a0to peer reviews. And while Davidson and McPhil disagree on some small points, both offer advice that I want to echo here: game plan.<\/p>\n

Before you do anything, make a list\/flow chart and timetable for your revision. Figure out which revisions you want to tackle first; number them. I typically prefer to do the \u201csmall-scale\u201d revisions first, delving into things like proofreading and sentence-level style before moving on to larger scale\/big-picture revisions, if only because the small-scale stuff tends to feel less intimidating and, again, offers a way in. I circle back to it later, of course, but there\u2019s something about just getting into the revision weeds that I find both comforting and encouraging. I can do this, one small step at a time. Most important, however, is to make a definitive revision plan and stick to it. If you go in aimless, you might never find your way out. If you veer off course, you might end up doing more harm than good or forget what it is you need to address. Worse yet, you might neglect the work altogether (procrastination: it\u2019s fun and easy!).<\/p>\n

Keep the Scraps<\/strong>
\nThere\u2019s always that one dissertation chapter. You know the one: the outlier that, try as you might, just won\u2019t sit right. If you haven\u2019t begun the dissertation process, then trust me when I say, you\u2019ll have that one chapter \u2015 I can almost guarantee it. For me, it was Chapter 3. From the prospectus on, I knew it was going to be \u2018that chapter\u2019 and the drafting process proved me right. While I had a fairly good handle on the rest of my chapters and their contributions to my overall argument, I could not, for the life of me, figure out how to make the third chapter work. My advisor agreed.<\/p>\n

I ended up deciding to move on and write the next chapter. I\u2019m glad I did. Not only did the time away from Chapter 3 afford me the necessary perspective to figure out what was going wrong (more on that in a minute) but it helped me crystallize what I was trying to argue in the larger \u201cstory arc\u201d of my dissertation. It led to an eventual breakthrough, but one that meant I had, in essence, to scrap almost the entirety of the third chapter and start again with the exception of a few paragraphs. It was a crushing but ultimately worthwhile decision.<\/p>\n

When I conferred with my advisor about the new and better direction for the chapter, she gave me an excellent piece of revision advice: \u201cThere\u2019s no such thing as wasted writing.\u201d She was right for several reasons. First, drafting is an important and necessary step in clarifying your thinking. Second, as she pointed out, you never know when that early writing might come in handy. Is it the seed of another article, essay, or project? A self-contained conference paper? Will you want to return to it later? Does it actually fit a different section of the project? Following my advisor\u2019s recommendation, I\u2019ve made a habit of starting \u201cdummy\u201d documents when I revise. Any piece of the argument that\u2019s not working or that I need to cut, I copy and paste to a different document and put it in its own folder. I don\u2019t delete it. DO NOT DELETE YOUR EARLY WORK. Save it for a rainy day. I now have scores of half-baked thoughts and\/or discarded ideas that I can develop or return later, if I want \u2015 ideas I like but that either need more work or don\u2019t suit a particular project. If nothing else, I sometimes think it would be hilarious, enjoyable, and really illuminating to start a blog full of my and others\u2019 decontextualized \u201cscrap\u201d writings from intros to body paragraphs. Who wants in?<\/p>\n

Defamiliarize Your Work<\/strong>
\nThe last and best strategy I can offer for revision is likely not new, but it\u2019s this: find a way to defamiliarize your work, whether it\u2019s writing and revising in\u00a0different fonts<\/a>\u00a0or simply walking away for a little bit or starting a new project and coming back with fresh eyes. I speak from experience: you cannot start revising immediately after you have finished writing; you\u2019re too close to the project. You won\u2019t catch mistakes and you won\u2019t always be able to discern what\u2019s working well and not. No meaningful revisions come immediately.<\/p>\n

There are many ways to \u201cdefamiliarize\u201d your own work (and I hope others will weigh in below), but here are ones that have either worked well for me or that have landed with my students:<\/p>\n

1)\u00a0Use the \u201cRead Aloud\u201d Feature<\/strong>:\u00a0I may be incredibly late to the party on this one (revision parties are a thing, yes?), but I recently discovered Word\u2019s \u201cRead Aloud\u201d feature and it has been a game-changer. I\u2019ve long been in the habit of reading my own work aloud and suggesting to my students that they do so, but it\u2019s never been especially effective for catching typos or weird-sounding sentences because my eyes inevitably see what they want to see. Hearing the work in someone else\u2019s voice, though, has really helped me catch things that I couldn\u2019t even after multiple rounds of proofreading and revision. It can be a bit slow, especially for a long project, so perhaps making a habit of it as you go along is a smart approach.<\/p>\n

2)\u00a0Reverse Outline<\/strong>\u200b:\u00a0This was a go-to strategy that I employed in my tutoring days and one I always teach my classes, but outlining the main points of the body paragraphs in revision and then visually being able to see the progression of the argument can be incredibly useful for addressing big-picture issues like structure and organization as well as fine-tuning topic sentences and transitions.<\/p>\n

3)\u00a0Cut-Ups<\/strong>: \u200bOne of the most successful revision meetings I\u2019ve ever had with a student involved us tearing her paper into paragraphs and playing around with them until we figured out the most effective order. I\u2019ve now made it a practice of doing in-class \u201ccut-up\u201d activities for things like paragraph and sentence organization; it\u2019s an instant, hands-on act of writing and revision. It\u2019s useful because it literally forces you to decontextualize the work and see each piece of the argument on its own in order to figure out where it would be most effective.<\/p>\n

And remember, if all else fails: steel yourself for revision with an exceedingly generous amount of coffee or something harder. It hasn\u2019t let me down yet.<\/p>\n

What are your best revision strategies? Tell us in the comments below!<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It\u2019s no secret that we here at GradHacker headquarters love to talk about the writing process. In the past month or so alone we\u2019ve offered tips for\u00a0getting started\u00a0on a big writing project and\u00a0increasing productivityand took\u00a0a deep dive\u00a0into the writing routines of five grad students across disciplines. We\u2019ve seemingly covered it all:\u00a0the good,\u00a0the bad, and\u00a0the ugly\u00a0(special […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":708,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,14,9,5],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-706","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-advice","8":"category-general-post","9":"category-life-of-a-grad-student","10":"category-research"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/08\/41095638801_e31ff7f7e4_o.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=706"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/706\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":707,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/706\/revisions\/707"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.tntech.edu\/graduate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}